Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Altering Freelist Groups in 10gR2 when moving to RAC from NON-RAC?

RE: Altering Freelist Groups in 10gR2 when moving to RAC from NON-RAC?

From: VIVEK_SHARMA <VIVEK_SHARMA_at_infosys.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 20:25:48 +0530
Message-ID: <BBD944BCAC3AB4499DFBAFB1D8AF302001D3EFDE@BLRKECMSG11.ad.infosys.com>


Jonathan, Folks  

A small change to include indexes too in the below Qs:-       

Qs Does conversion of freelist groups to 4 needs to be done ONLY for Tables & Indexes which undergo INSERTs & NOT for Tables / Indexes which undergo UPDATEs, SELECTs, DELETEs?  

NOTE Our Database Size is Huge i.e. 3 TB.  

Qs Any Other parameter that should also be changed when moving a NON-RAC Database to RAC?  

Thanks indeed for responding  

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Lewis Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 3:17 PM To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: Altering Freelist Groups in 10gR2 ?    

The only option is to do the CTAS, as the freelist group

blocks are located immediately after the segment header

block in the first extent.  

The only other option to consider is 'alter table move' to

move the table into a tablespace defined to use ASSM

and forget about freelist groups - but I'm not very keen

on ASSM for high-performance, high-concurrency systems

myself.  

Regards  

Jonathan Lewis  

From: "VIVEK_SHARMA" <VIVEK_SHARMA_at_infosys.com>

To: <oracle-l_at_freelists.org>

Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 10:42 AM

Subject: Altering Freelist Groups in 10gR2 ?  

Folks  

When converting a NON-RAC Database to RAC in 10.2, the freelist groups

need to be altered to 4(= to the Number of RAC Nodes)  

How is the freelist groups to be altered?  

Seek to avoid usage of the CTAS command i.e. "Create Table <Duplicate

Tbl Name with freelist groups 4> As Select * from Original Table" since

this is very tedious  

Is there any performance issue/Others with using the alter approach

versus the CTAS approach?  

Thanks indeed

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Wed Sep 27 2006 - 09:55:48 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US