Re: Table partion storage

From: Alessandro Vercelli <alever_at_libero.it>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:46:04 +0200
Message-Id: <J5XPOS$8FBA0A3DE0B86B6FBAF5B16A16AFC6C8@libero.it>

Infact involved tablespace is locally managed....

Thanks for your help,

Alessandro

> What Kind is the Tablespace Locally Managed or Dictionary Managed. If it is
> Locally Managed the Next Extent is Used only for Creation and then Ignored.
>
> - Ganesh
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Thu Sep 21 2006 - 03:46:04 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Laimutis Nedzinskas: "RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?(specifically, when do most actual failovers really occur?)"
Previous message: Laimutis Nedzinskas: "RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?(specifically, when do most actual failovers really occur?)"
Maybe in reply to: Alessandro Vercelli: "Table partion storage"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US