Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better? (specifically, when do most actual failovers really occur?)

RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better? (specifically, when do most actual failovers really occur?)

From: Kevin Closson <kevinc_at_polyserve.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 10:43:14 -0700
Message-ID: <5D2570CAFC98974F9B6A759D1C74BAD0E5B0D0@ex2.ms.polyserve.com>

 >>>take per 1h for example?

>>>
>>>If you go into
>>>http://www.scaleabilities.co.uk/book/ScalingOracle8i-Creative
Commons.htm
>>>then you can find a nice example of HA design at the end of

great book :-) I contributed this to James' work because I was working in the Oracle port to Sequent HW at the time:

http://www.scaleabilities.co.uk/book/CH08.html#996744

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Wed Sep 20 2006 - 12:43:14 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US