Re: Block dump - Uncommitted TXN - Help Urgent

On 9/19/06, John Kanagaraj <john.kanagaraj_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> BN,
>
> > > I wasn't sure where the Blocker loosing his time, Later in the evening
> , I
> > noticed that there were many ST enqueue locks (no, we are not using LMTS
> -
> > For all new tables I am pushing LMTS). I am assuming that this could be
> an
> > issue. Bumped up the next extent size. The tables were large and extents
> > were in 1000s.
> > >
> > > I am also monitoring v$session_wait. Its intermittent and fast. The
> users
> > complain that they are stuck and if they retry they are back to normal.
> > >
>
> Is your "TEMP" tablespace LMT or Dict? Is it of type temporary or
> normal? I ask this because you mention ST enqueue and this is held for
> creating/dropping extents in a dict managed tbs.... You might be
> mistaking a 'enqueue' wait for a user lock when it is actually waiting
> for a "system" lock (on FET$ and UET$)....
>
> --
> John Kanagaraj <><
> DB Soft Inc
> Phone: 408-970-7002 (W)
>
> Disappointment is always inevitable; Discouragement is invariably optional
>
> ** The opinions and facts contained in this message are entirely mine
> and do not reflect those of my employer or customers **
>

Greetings John

TBS STATUS CONTENTS EXTENT_MAN ALLOCATIO --------------- --------- --------- ---------- --------- TEMP ONLINE TEMPORARY LOCAL UNIFORM

-- 
Regards & Thanks
BN

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l