Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: 2GB or not 2GB (datafile limit)? That is the question.

Re: 2GB or not 2GB (datafile limit)? That is the question.

From: Nuno Souto <dbvision_at_iinet.net.au>
Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2006 22:55:50 +1000
Message-ID: <4502B9D6.9010508@iinet.net.au>


Jesse, Rich wrote,on my timestamp of 9/09/2006 12:16 AM:

>
> I don't see any need to limit the datafile size to 2GB anymore. Anyone
> else?

None here. Since 9i and most *n*x releases since Y2K, it's a non-event: the 2GB restriction is gone, dead and buried.

The "largest number of Oracle blocks per file" limit still applies. That's around 30GB with 8K block sizes.

Unless you're using 10g and Oracle largefiles, in which case it's not an issue.
Watch out for file system's largest file size: there are a few around with limits around the 200GB mark. Not many left, but worth checking.

Other than backup related constraints, I can't see file size limits being much of an issue anymore. Bar the 30GB limit: that's a bit of a nuisance when talking about multi-TB databases. But then you should be looking at those with 10g, not 9i.

-- 
Cheers
Nuno Souto
dbvision_at_iinet.net.au
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Sat Sep 09 2006 - 07:55:50 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US