Re: Automatic Shared Memory question

From: rjamya <rjamya_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:29:32 -0400
Message-ID: <9177895d0608211229l6c64605frc9b79bf70fa87fcd@mail.gmail.com>

speculating here ...

it is possible that it would represent the difference between sga_max_size and sga_target? that space would be reserved in anticipation that you might need it to expand? A quick test would be to increate cache_size by 128M and see if that makes a correcponding dent in KGH-NO ACCESS.

while on the subject of speculating ... doesn't kgh functions correspond to heap allocation/deallocation ??

Of course I could be wrong and would welcome corrections. Raj

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Mon Aug 21 2006 - 14:29:32 CDT