Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Primary Keys optional?

RE: Primary Keys optional?

From: Khemmanivanh, Somckit <somckit.khemmanivanh_at_weyerhaeuser.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 10:15:44 -0700
Message-ID: <65C0D8935651CB4D96E97CEFAC5A12B9022F1A86@wafedixm10.corp.weyer.pri>

 

Alot of the SAP Pool tables have gone away with Netweaver04 and 04s...(i.e. BW, XI, EP, WebAS don't really use them)...

Even in R/3 Enterprise and ECC they have been officially de-supported (although you can still create them for you own use)...


From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jared Still Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 9:29 AM
To: Brandon.Allen_at_oneneck.com
Cc: andert_at_gmail.com; oracle-l_at_freelists.org Subject: Re: Primary Keys optional?

On 8/17/06, Allen, Brandon <Brandon.Allen_at_oneneck.com> wrote:

        I'm not trying to promote the creation of tables w/o PKs, but just FYI -

        I work with the Baan ERP application (you've probably never heard of it,

Heard of it, never seen it.

        but I think they used to be #5 behind SAP, Oracle, etc. - Boeing is

	their largest customer) and they do not use PKs or any RI in the
	database - they use unique indexes with not null constraints,
and they
	manage all the RI w/in the application.  Not ideal, but I must
admit 
	they've done a pretty good job of implementing it this way -
it's never
	caused us any problems in the 8yrs I've been working with it.
I've
	heard that some of the other big ERPs (maybe even SAP - anyone
know?)
	are designed similarly.



True it is not ideal.

The big difference between an app like this and a custom in house bag of columns is that it was modeled and designed.

SAP is similar. They do not use RI nor PK. They do have unique indexes with NOT NULL columns, so PK can be created if necessary. (Think replication)

While I don't care for some of the things SAP does, they do a good job of maintaining integrity within the app.

There are various reasons for doing this.

        Another thing to consider in letting the app manage the RI is that you

        can't easily view the relationships for reporting purposes when trying

        to use Crystal or some other 3rd party reporting tool.                  

No kidding.

SAP is lotsa fun.

The one thing that is done in SAP (and needs to go away) is pool/cluster tables.

The physical table has a few key columns and one LONG RAW column for the data, which is compressed (and unreadable except thru ABAP). There are several
logical tables in a physical table.

When you are trying to do something directly from the database and run into that,
you are done.

-- 
Jared Still
Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist 




--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Fri Aug 18 2006 - 12:15:44 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US