Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Primary Keys optional?

RE: Primary Keys optional?

From: Yasin Baskan <yasbs_at_kocbank.com.tr>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 09:53:59 +0300
Message-ID: <083667B535F3464CA0DD0D1DAFA4E3760A8413DB@camexc1.kfs.local>

Besides, having validation and integrity in the database has important performance improvements. Primary keys and referential integrity helps the cbo to take cleverer actions and produce better plans. I do not have a test case for that now but i remember lots of them at the asktom site. Or we must ask Jonathan Lewis about that :-)

From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of William B Ferguson Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 11:45 PM To: Khemmanivanh, Somckit
Cc: andert_at_gmail.com; jkstill_at_gmail.com; oracle-l_at_freelists.org; oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
Subject: RE: Primary Keys optional?

It's rarely good practice to ever depend on an application for data validation and integrity. Things (and applications) change.

Depend on the database for these simple and basic steps instead of the application. And, if the application does do data validation and integrity, nothing is broken anyway by enabling it at the database level.



                              Bill Ferguson
           U.S. Geological Survey - Minerals Information Team
                          PO Box 25046, MS-750
                          Denver Federal Center
                         Denver, Colorado 80225
          Voice (303)236-8747 ext. 321     Fax   (303)236-4208
     ~ Think on a grand scale, start to implement on a small scale ~

"Khemmanivanh, Somckit" <somckit.khemmanivanh_at_weyerhaeuser.com>

08/17/2006 02:39 PM

To

<wbfergus_at_usgs.gov>, <jkstill_at_gmail.com>

cc

<andert_at_gmail.com>, <oracle-l_at_freelists.org>,
<oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org>

Subject

RE: Primary Keys optional?           

Could the data validations/verification be done at the App level?

Of course, the developers should have know this if that were the case...

Bu mesaj ve onunla iletilen tum ekler gonderildigi kisi ya da kuruma ozel ve Bankalar Kanunu geregince, gizlilik yukumlulugu tasiyor olabilir. Bu mesaj, hicbir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz; mesajin yetkili alicisi veya alicisina iletmekten sorumlu kisi degilseniz, mesaj icerigini ya da eklerini kopyalamayiniz, yayinlamayiniz, baska kisilere yonlendirmeyiniz ve mesaji gonderen kisiyi derhal uyararak bu mesaji siliniz. Bu mesajin iceriginde ya da eklerinde yer alan bilgilerin dogrulugu, butunlugu ve guncelligi Bankamiz tarafindan garanti edilmemektedir ve bilinen viruslere karsi kontrolleri yapilmis olarak yollanan mesajin sisteminizde yaratabilecegi zararlardan Bankamiz sorumlu tutulamaz.

This message and the files attached to it are under the privacy liability in accordance with the Banking Law and confidential to the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. This message cannot be copied, disclosed or sold monetary consideration for any purpose. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you should not copy, distribute, disclose or forward the information that exists in the content and in the attachments of this message; please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message. Our Bank does not warrant the accuracy, integrity and currency of the information transmitted with this message. This message has been detected for all known computer viruses thence our Bank is not liable for the occurrence of any system corruption caused by this message

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Fri Aug 18 2006 - 01:53:59 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US