Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Inheriting a "interesting" recovery process

RE: Inheriting a "interesting" recovery process

From: Cary Millsap <cary.millsap_at_hotsos.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 10:09:06 -0500
Message-ID: <C970F08BBE1E164AA8063E01502A71CF6678E5@WIN02.hotsos.com>


I guess it could be if you were to mount your file systems beneath ORADATA. But, um, I don't think that's the effect they're going for.

Cary Millsap
Hotsos Enterprises, Ltd.
http://www.hotsos.com
Nullius in verba  

Hotsos Symposium 2007 / March 4-8 / Dallas Visit www.hotsos.com for curriculum and schedule details...

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Hemant K Chitale Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 9:38 AM
To: Paul.Vincent_at_uce.ac.uk; oracle-l_at_freelists.org Subject: RE: Inheriting a "interesting" recovery process

I don't understand how putting ORADATA under ORACLE_BASE is "Flexible" in any way.

Hemant

At 09:56 PM Tuesday, Paul Vincent wrote:
>Well, let's see...
>
>Oracle Database Installation Guide, 10g Release 2 (10.2) for Microsoft
>Windows (32-Bit) B14316-02. Appendix C, Optimal Flexible Architecture.
>Page C-5, in the section "OFA Directory Naming Conventions":
>
>"ORADATA Directory
>
>Database files are stored in ORACLE_BASE\oradata\DB_NAME. Names and
>brief descriptions are:

Hemant K Chitale
http://web.singnet.com.sg/~hkchital

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Tue Aug 08 2006 - 10:09:06 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US