Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Inheriting a "interesting" recovery process

Re: Inheriting a "interesting" recovery process

From: Rodd Holman <Rodd.Holman_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 12:50:32 -0500
Message-ID: <44D388E8.9000106@gmail.com>


Actually we do the same thing here only the archives are .arc. We as DBA's are also closely integrated with the ifrastructure folks though. Half of them were former DBA's so they know better.

As far as mountpoints, we break OFA there also and use a separate area for data files/control files/redo logs/and archived logs. That way we can put the database on one backup schedule and the software on another. The oracle home doesn't normally change much so a nightly backup of that is not nearly as critical as the backup of the oradata stuff.

Rodd

Jesse, Rich wrote:
> Which is precisely why I break this OFA rule and name every Oracle DB
> file with a ".dbf" extension. It eliminates the confusion of the dual
> meaning of the term "log" for the archived logs, making it a simple rule
> to let the SAs know that ".dbf" files are important
> don't-touch-without-asking Oracle files. Even before taking my first
> Oracle DBA class the ".log" naming jumped out at me.
>
> As I've said before, I do like the vast majority of the structure of
> OFA, but this and having the datafile mountpoint under ORACLE_BASE (or
> is it ORACLE_HOME?) are two that I think are asking for trouble.
>
> Rich
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Fri Aug 04 2006 - 12:50:32 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US