Not yet. The 1.5 is still larger than what the error is complaining
about and it is on the target, not the catalog, and the errors says it's
a RPC error, which makes it look like the catalog is the problem. Have
you seen something like this to make you think it is actually the
target?
On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 13:31 +0100, David Sharples wrote:
> Thats a 1.5Mb large pool in one of the instances, have you tried
> increasing it
>
> On 17/07/06, John P Weatherman <asahoshi_at_infionline.net> wrote:
> All,
>
>
>
> NAME TYPE VALUE
> ------------------------------------ -----------
> -----------------------
> large_pool_size big integer 33554432
> shared_pool_reserved_size big integer 26843545
> shared_pool_size big integer 536870912
>
> as should the target (though the errors says it is coming from
> the RPC,
> so this shouldn't be the issue):
>
> NAME TYPE VALUE
> ------------------------------------ -----------
> -----------------------
> large_pool_size string 1572792
> shared_pool_reserved_size string 2000000
> shared_pool_size string 20000000
>
>
>
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Mon Jul 17 2006 - 08:02:01 CDT
