Re: sort_area_size and hash_area_size

Do you have pga_aggregate_target set and work_areaaize_policy to automatic (the defaults for 9i) becuase if you are and you are not using shared server then the *_area_size parameters arent used

On 04/07/06, Oliver.Jost_at_ca.fujitsu.com <Oliver.Jost_at_ca.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
>
> Thank you,Hi David,
> I'm working on 9.2.0.6
>
> Oliver
>
>
> ** The information in this e-mail message including any attachment is
> intended only for the named recipients above and may contain confidential
> information. If you have received this message in error, or are not the
> named recipient(s), please immediately notify the sender by replying to the
> message and deleting all copies of it from your computer. **
>
>
>
> *"David Sharples" <davidsharples_at_gmail.com>*
>
> 07/04/2006 01:54 PM
> To
> Oliver.Jost_at_ca.fujitsu.com
> cc
> oracle-l_at_freelists.org Subject
> Re: sort_area_size and hash_area_size
>
>
>
>
> oracle version?
>
> On 04/07/06, *Oliver.Jost_at_ca.fujitsu.com* <Oliver.Jost_at_ca.fujitsu.com> <*Oliver.Jost_at_ca.fujitsu.com
> * <Oliver.Jost_at_ca.fujitsu.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
> I did some testing on this quite some time ago and was hoping to have a
> refresher.... I have an application with a particularly nasty view... given
> that I can not go in and fix the view without breaching protocol, I was
> going to increase the sort area size and hash area size at the session
> level.... Now that I'm revisiting this I remember there were some
> considerations for negatively impacting performance. After failing to find
> any information on this negative impact... does anyone know of some
> considerations I should make before going forward?
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l