Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Long execute phase for SELECT query

Re: Long execute phase for SELECT query

From: Stephane Faroult <sfaroult_at_roughsea.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 19:37:13 +0200
Message-ID: <44A2BE49.9020004@roughsea.com>


It may come from sorts (explicit or implicit ones, eg GROUP BY) especially if they take place on disk, or from big hash joins that would also take place on disk. With 27 tables the number of combinations is rather high and the optimizer can be forgiven for getting confused. As a first approach, and since the number of returned rows is low, I would try to favor a nested loop approach with a hint in the FIRST ROWS family. Unfortunately I doubt it will be enough. I suspect that there is a rather selective criterion in your query that doesn't look so to Oracle. You may find this useful:
http://roughsea.com/article.php3?id_article=60

HTH Stéphane Faroult

Allen, Brandon wrote:
> I've got a monster join (27 tables) coming from my Baan ERP app. It's
> taking 0.00 seconds to parse and only .05 seconds to fetch, but is
> taking 15.05 seconds for the execute phase - see below from tkprof:
>
> call count cpu elapsed disk query current
> rows
> ------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
> ----------
> Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
> 0
> Execute 2 13.94 15.05 0 0 0
> 0
> Fetch 4 0.00 0.05 16 420 0
> 22
> ------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
> ----------
> total 7 13.94 15.12 16 420 0
> 22
>
>
> I've never seen a SELECT query with such a high Execute time before -
> usually only DML queries take time in this phase and SELECT queries
> spend their time in the Fetch phase. Any ideas what would cause this
> behaviour? Oracle version 10.2.0.2 on AIX 5.3
>
> If you want to see the query and explain plan, let me know and I'd be
> happy to provide it - I just didn't include it here because it's huge
> and I'm not sure it's relevant.
>
> Thanks,
> Brandon
>
> Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Wed Jun 28 2006 - 12:37:13 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US