Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: RAC and ASM disk layout

Re: RAC and ASM disk layout

From: Ghassan Salem <salem.ghassan_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 15:12:54 +0200
Message-ID: <411d50f60606120612p5d4803a3oe40e244bc58993a0@mail.gmail.com>


Niall,
both bugs referred to in this notes are fixed in 10.2.0.2 and they do not seem to lead to data loss or corruption (they resemble a lot what Alex refers to in his blog note about ASM).

rgds

On 6/12/06, Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 6/12/06, Ghassan Salem <salem.ghassan_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > For sure, if ASM screws up, it's more dangerous than CBO screwing up,
> > but It seems to be a fairly stable piece of code, and there are not that
> > many bugs in it.
> > If anybody has a problem with what it does (e.g. failure groups) you may
> > (or NOT) use that feature, or not use ASM at all.
> > Reading the emails on this thread, one thinks that ASM is a very
> > dangerous option, that you're not supposed to use (or use at your risk). I
> > think the picture is not that bad.
> >
>
> I don't think anyone said not to use it, not even kevin!
>
> Take a look at Note *353065.1 *for example as well.
>
> --
> > Niall Litchfield
> > Oracle DBA
> > http://www.orawin.info
> >
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Mon Jun 12 2006 - 08:12:54 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US