Re: RAC and ASM disk layout

On 6/12/06, Ghassan Salem <salem.ghassan_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> For sure, if ASM screws up, it's more dangerous than CBO screwing up, but
> It seems to be a fairly stable piece of code, and there are not that many
> bugs in it.
> If anybody has a problem with what it does (e.g. failure groups) you may
> (or NOT) use that feature, or not use ASM at all.
> Reading the emails on this thread, one thinks that ASM is a very dangerous
> option, that you're not supposed to use (or use at your risk). I think the
> picture is not that bad.
>

I don't think anyone said not to use it, not even kevin!

Take a look at Note *353065.1 *for example as well.

 --
> Niall Litchfield
> Oracle DBA
> http://www.orawin.info
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l