Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RAC and ASM disk layout

RAC and ASM disk layout

From: Daiminger, Helmut <HELMUT.DAIMINGER_at_wwk.de>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 12:41:43 +0200
Message-ID: <99585773B6B1BA42BC4FE5DF14BB842F0481CC33@SERV211.wwk-group.com>


Hi!

We are new to RAC and are discovering serveral uncertainties regarding the best disk layout to use for ASM. We are running two EMC Clariion systems (under RAID-5) and want ASM to write to both Clariions simultaneously (i.e. use normal redundancy). ASM will balance the load across the two failover groups (i.e. two LUNs) which reside in two EMC Clariion arrays.

The question is, whether it is better to use a single LUN with 100 GB or have a number of smaller LUNs (totalling 100 GB). Since we are using a single raid group (i.e. 5 disks) for all database storage, all LUNs will end up on the same physical devices anyway. So it might be harmful having ASM to try and balance I/O across several LUNs which all reside on the same physical devices.

This is 10.2 on HP-UX 11.23.

Thanks,
Helmut

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Fri Jun 09 2006 - 05:41:43 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US