Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: 10G and UFS - long write times

RE: 10G and UFS - long write times

From: Ron Rogers <RROGERS_at_galottery.org>
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 08:13:40 -0400
Message-Id: <s487dc4d.065@smtp.galottery.org>


John,
 That is exactly what I noticed when I migrated to 10G on Linux. The log waits increased while writing the archivelogs. I have 2 systems, same OS same 10g setup but one does not do archiving. The archiving system waits during a SQLLDR load and the non archivelogging does not wait. I checked Metalink at the time and it did not explain the problem. I have sence upgraded to 10g2 and the wait is still there. I does not cause a performance problem for me because the loads all occur in the quiet times.
 I have been waiting for a patch release to fix the problem. Ron

>>> "Hallas, John, Tech Dev" <John.Hallas_at_gb.vodafone.co.uk> 06/08/06
4:23 AM >>>
True Felix but that is not the point.

I wanted an easy script to recreate a problem  

It does not explain why it takes say 30 seconds on 9i and 9 minutes on 10G on boxes that should be set up the same.

I use the word should carefully as I am assured we have a very conformant build standard that applies to all servers. I cannot guarantee that myself and frankly do not have the skills nor the time to do so.  

John  


From: F.Castillo_at_hzd.hessen.de [mailto:F.Castillo_at_hzd.hessen.de] Sent: 08 June 2006 09:19
To: Hallas, John, Tech Dev; oracle-l_at_freelists.org Subject: AW: 10G and UFS - long write times  

Hi  

if you're really using this script you're issuing 50000 commits - no wonder it takes so long. Make the commit at least outside the loop!  

Felix  

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] Im Auftrag von Hallas, John, Tech Dev
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. Juni 2006 10:16 An: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Betreff: 10G and UFS - long write times

We are seeing big problems when issuing disk writes using 10G (both 10.1 and 10.2). Reads are not an issue

Very difficult to track down the exact combination but so far it looks as if it is a combination of 10G and local disk mounted using UFS .

V440 Solaris servers could also come into the combination because that is what I have done a lot of the testing on as that is what is available. I have now tested on around 10-12 servers with consistent findings.  

The test is very simple and quick to do. Searching Metalink and WebIV does not give any clues. I am about to log a tar but I know I will require all sorts of Unix information which is quite long-winded for me to get so any help would be appreciated.  

The test  

CREATE TABLE test( a number, b CHAR(2000) )tablespace xxxx ;  

Set timing on  

BEGIN       FOR r IN 1..50000 LOOP

            INSERT INTO test (a,b) VALUES (r, 'test');

            COMMIT;       END LOOP; END   On SAN disk and 9i on local UFS mounted disk I am seeing response times from 0:15 to 0:30 seconds

On 10G on San I see the same

On 10G using local UFS disk the time various from 7:00 to 9:00 minutes and is very repeatable.  

I have tried around 10 servers now and the results are consistent.  

Whilst we have quite a few 10G installations, not many are on local disk and the majority are on Sun 440 (2.9 OS) so my results may indicate a UFS problem when it could be an OS one (or an Oracle one of course). OS writes to disk are stable at twice as fast on San as local disk and the fact that 90i does not show a problem seems to take away the OS part out of the equation. But nothing is certain yet.

PS the waits are all IO related - log buffer , log file sync etc  

Thanks for any help  

John      

The information transmitted is intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email in error please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Thu Jun 08 2006 - 07:13:40 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US