RE: Opatch and downtime (was: RE: Metalink and availability)

Would you still have to take down time in order to run post patch sql scripts? Or is there around that as well?

Thanks!
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jeremiah Wilton Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 9:02 AM
To: mvetmp-ora_at_yahoo.com; 'Oracle-L Freelists' Subject: Opatch and downtime (was: RE: Metalink and availability)

Vitaliy <mvetmp-ora_at_yahoo.com> wrote
...
> I had a concern about patching ORACLE_HOME while the instance is
running
> (as described in your article by modifying patch scripts and oracle
make-
> files). I think that replacing shared libraries that oracle binaries
> depend on might cause some side-effects on the running instance(s).

I agree, and the solution is to treat shared libraries like binaries. The
targets in the makefiles for shared libraries can be modified in a way similar to the binaries, and you can follow the same procedure of swapping
them out during a brief downtime.

> It's also not supported as the patch clearly states that all processes

> must be down.

Oracle BDE and support have always supported me in this procedure when I explained it to them. Sometimes Oracle will work with you to support tactics that provide higher availability, even when those tactics don't follow the exact procedure Oracle has proscribed.

> Instead, I would suggest to pre-stage a copy of patched ORACLE_HOME
that
> was built on a different server, shutdown all running instances and
> quickly switch ORACLE_HOMEs then apply DB portion of the upgrade (if
any).

This is also a fine method. My problem with it has always been that one-off
patches are often less than a few Mb in size. My method is very efficient
and requires a lot less prep time on the part of the DBA. Copying around
your 2Gb master ORACLE_HOME is pretty inefficient and time-consuming in comparison. However, as you point out, your method leaves you in a state
that requires very little explanation to support.

--
Jeremiah Wilton
ORA-600 Consulting
http://www.ora-600.net

--- Jeremiah Wilton <jeremiah_at_ora-600.net> wrote:


> The thing that takes the most time with the CPU patches on Unix is

that


> Opatch patches and relinks one binary at a time serially.  Having the

> database down is completely unnecessary for many of these binaries,

such


> as sqlplus etc.  Furthermore, even running binaries like oracle and 

> tnslsnr can be relinked with the databases open and running, and

staged as


> alternately named files (oracle-new, tnslsnr-new).  You can then move

them


> all into place during a very brief outage for all instances.

> 

> There are a number of tricks that you can use to greatly reduce the

apply


> time for the CPU patches.  Start with the one-off patch apply

guidelines


> in my paper:

> 

> http://www.ora-600.net/articles/stayinalive.pdf


--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l




--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l