Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: FileSystem (Volume) Sizes and Names (questions)

RE: FileSystem (Volume) Sizes and Names (questions)

From: Kevin Closson <kevinc_at_polyserve.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 09:17:11 -0700
Message-ID: <5D2570CAFC98974F9B6A759D1C74BAD0E5A557@ex2.ms.polyserve.com>


>>>I would like "smaller" volumes [eg each mount point between
>>>10% to 20% of the total size, thus 5 to 10 mount points] for
>>>the database files [of course, still using some standard
>>>sizes, eg 20GB [for the 100GB databases] across servers.
>>>This allows flexibility in relocating datafiles etc.

Why on earth do you want to do that? Filesystems are supposed to make it simpler to build that 100GB database. Get a single filesystem with SAME under it and make your life easier. If you need more space later, grow the volume, gorw the filesystem and go on with your life.

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Thu May 25 2006 - 11:17:11 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US