Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: 10.2.0.2 Core dumps

Re: 10.2.0.2 Core dumps

From: Stefan Knecht <knecht.stefan_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 11:51:59 +0200
Message-ID: <486b2b610605170251x357eae4dn588e9f114c94cabd@mail.gmail.com>


Thanks for everyone's input..

catpatch has been run, and didn't report any errors.

ulimit settings are also there according to the docs.

Stefan

On 5/16/06, Jesse, Rich <Rich.Jesse_at_qg.com> wrote:
>
> Just curious: Does the output of "ulimit -a" show acceptable limits as
> described in the installation guide? I've recently been shown the light
> that I've been mistakenly skipping over that requirement, which has at
> least changed between 9iR2 and 10gR2 for Linux (e.g. "ulimit -p").
>
> Rich
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:
> oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] *On Behalf Of *Stefan Knecht
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 16, 2006 1:57 AM
> *To:* oracle-l
> *Subject:* 10.2.0.2 Core dumps
>
> Hello all
>
> Anyone else experience unusually often occurring coredumps and segfaults
> on 10.2.0.2 (linux) ?
>
> Even the upgrade from 10.2.0.1 to 10.2.0.2 core dumped on me on first run.
> After flashing the database back and retrying it ran fine. However, now the
> main application running on this (test) system caused oracle to dump core
> more frequently then not.
>
> Getting loads of different variants of ORA-7445 :
> core dump [qesmmIUnRegisterWorkArea()+628] [SIGILL] [Illegal
> operand][0x8EA33E0] [] []
> core dump [kglhpd_internal()+1298] [SIGSEGV] [Address not mapped to
> object][0x14C63C8] [] []
> core dump [kcbget()+1662] [SIGSEGV] [Address not mapped to object] [0xE]
> [] []
> core dump [eomg_migrate_contents_as_needed()+762] [SIGSEGV] [Address not
> mapped to object] [0xFFF8] [] []
> core dump [ksarcv()+328] [SIGSEGV] [Address not mapped to object] [0x0] []
> []
> core dump [kcbgcur()+2685] [SIGSEGV] [Address not mapped to object] [0xE]
> [] []
>
> Anyone experience similar problems with this release ?
>
> Regards Stefan
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Wed May 17 2006 - 04:51:59 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US