Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: To use SAME or NOT for High End Storage Setup ? ....StripeUnit Size 32 MB Vs. 64 KB ?

RE: To use SAME or NOT for High End Storage Setup ? ....StripeUnit Size 32 MB Vs. 64 KB ?

From: Kevin Closson <kevinc_at_polyserve.com>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 07:57:03 -0700
Message-ID: <5D2570CAFC98974F9B6A759D1C74BAD0E5A42C@ex2.ms.polyserve.com>

 >>>

>>>Kevin,
>>>
>>>Thanks for correcting me "a 4MB stripe width will reduce the
>>>odds there will be cross-stripe reads, but in no way
>>>eliminates it.", you're quite right.
>>>I should have made that point myself.

no worries...I'm not sure people are yet taking a sufficiently simplistic look at SAME. It really is supposed to be simple... threads bled off into confusion between stripe width and depth and I sort of bailed. The simplest rule is stripe across all disks. The only subtlety is regarding what st widths some arrays support and whether you have to use a software vol mgr to cunk together LUNs from the array. Oracle can do a 1MB IO (scattered read, direct path read/write) so make the stripe width larger than that...and if the array wont stripe that large (as some I work with), then go with the largest it does support.

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Tue May 16 2006 - 09:57:03 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US