Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: ASM is single point of failure ?

Re: ASM is single point of failure ?

From: <tonions_at_medquist.com>
Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 16:20:40 -0400
Message-ID: <OF164CF253.EF426E8B-ON85257167.006FC1A0-85257167.006FC1A3@medquist.com>

I believe you are right and it would certainly not be good if the ASM instance failed, but Oracle might argue that ASM is a cut down Oracle instance so stands less chance of failing;). If I read the RAC stuff correctly you get an ASM instance per RAC node so have reliance against bringing down the DB if you under RAC.
 
In actual fact we did have ASM bring down our non-RAC Dev DB not so long ago - the SA was testing removing and adding back in disks from a normal redundancy disk group and hit an ASM bug!


-----oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org wrote: -----

To: _oracle_L_list <oracle-l@freelists.org>
From: "Ranko Mosic" <ranko.mosic@gmail.com>
Sent by: oracle-l-bounce@fre elists.org
Date: 05/07/2006 19:53
Subject: ASM is single point of failure ?

Hi List,
Just thinking aloud - when ASM crashes then all instances connected to it crash too.
This can't be good, right ?
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l Received on Sun May 07 2006 - 15:20:40 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US