Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Very high buffer gets

RE: Very high buffer gets

From: fairlie rego <fairlie_r_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:22:22 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <20060214002222.2237.qmail@web31909.mail.mud.yahoo.com>


Hi Naveen    

  Isn't this the same issue as described in Metalink note 310923.1    

  Regards,
  Fairlie

"Nahata, Naveen (US - Glen Mills)" <nnahata_at_deloitte.com> wrote:

      9.2.0.6 (on HP-UX)     



  From: Alex Gorbachev [mailto:gorbyx_at_gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 4:07 PM
To: Nahata, Naveen (US - Glen Mills)
Cc: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: Very high buffer gets   

If I recall correctly this is a bug in AQ handling. I think you should be able to find it easilly on Metalink. I think Oracle attributes LIO that is caused by QMN during queue maintenance (delayed purging) instead of attributing those LIOs to the statements causing it. What is your version?

  2006/2/13, Nahata, Naveen (US - Glen Mills) <nnahata_at_deloitte.com>: Hi All,

After tracing the QMON process which was doing lots of buffer gets, I found this culprit. None of the three tables involved in the query have more than 2 blocks. I know the nested loop is iterating over the blocks but that should still not account for more than 200 blocks / execution. Why do I see such high values for buffer gets?

select t.schema , t.name, t.flags, q.name from
system.aq$_queue_tables t, sys.aq$_queue_table_affinities aft, system.aq$_queues q where aft.table_objno = t.objno and aft.owner_instance =

  :1 and        q.table_objno = t.objno and q.usage = 0 and
bitand(t.flags, 4+16+32+64+128+256) = 0       and NOT       ( t.name
in
('DEF$_AQCALL' , 'DEF$_AQERROR') and t.schema = 'SYSTEM')for update of t.name, aft.table_objno skip locked

call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------



Parse 84 0.00 0.03 0 0 0 0
Execute 84 0.03 0.03 0 0 0 0
Fetch 84 11.87 47.87 266 536288 45281 4627
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

total 252 11.90 47.94 266 536288 45281 4627

Misses in library cache during parse: 1 Optimizer goal: CHOOSE
Parsing user id: SYS (recursive depth: 1)

Rows Row Source Operation

-------  ---------------------------------------------------

    60 FOR UPDATE
    62 HASH JOIN
    59 NESTED LOOPS

    59     TABLE ACCESS FULL AQ$_QUEUE_TABLES
    59     TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID AQ$_QUEUE_TABLE_AFFINITIES
    59      INDEX UNIQUE SCAN AQ$_QTABLE_AFFINITIES_PK (object id 2400)
    64 TABLE ACCESS FULL AQ$_QUEUES Naveen

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message.

Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. [v.E.1]

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l 






-- 
Best regards,
Alex Gorbachev 


Fairlie Rego
Senior Oracle Consultant
Optus Telecommunications
www.optus.com.au
Mobile: +61 4 02 792 405
Home: +61 2 8920 0273

 
When I read about the evils of drinking, I gave up reading.






		

---------------------------------
What are the most popular cars? Find out at Yahoo! Autos -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Mon Feb 13 2006 - 18:22:22 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US