Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: high avg read time for "temporary tablespace"

Re: high avg read time for "temporary tablespace"

From: Sami Seerangan <dba.orcl_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 11:32:20 -0500
Message-ID: <f09dd6280602100832k7c8c5560w567f377448cfd977@mail.gmail.com>


Roger,

Thanks for your response.
As I mentioned that there is no ORDER BY,DISTINCT ,UNION and group by,etc. I put a monitoring jobs on v$sort_usage to find out who (and what statement) uses extensive temp tablespace. let me check after sometime.
Thanks again.

On 2/9/06, Roger Xu <roger_xu_at_dp7uptx.com> wrote:
> I meant it depends on the SQL statements either using a cursor or not.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
> [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]On Behalf Of Roger Xu
> Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 5:04 PM
> To: dba.orcl_at_gmail.com; oracle-l
> Subject: RE: high avg read time for "temporary tablespace"
>
>
> yes, cursor uses temp if the sql statements have ORDER BY,DISTINCT ,UNION and group
> by,etc.

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Fri Feb 10 2006 - 10:32:20 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US