RE: Centralized names resolution

Lyn,
 
  Could you elaborate on how you store tnsnames information in Active
Directory?
 
Thank you,
Jay

________________________________

From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Plunkett, Lyn
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 10:52 AM
To: topshot.rhit_at_gmail.com; oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: RE: Centralized names resolution


We moved from tnsnames at each of our sites, updated via batch scripts,
to storing the tnsnames info in Active Directory, and letting AD handle
the replication for us. It's much easier to keep things in synch.  It is
easier for us leverage AD rather than setting up the OID databases and
their replication.
 
Lyn

________________________________

From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Michael Ray
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 4:15 PM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Centralized names resolution


<snip>
Is there any benefit to using OID instead? Note this isn't for some
enterprise-wide solution. While they do have plants all over the world,
it's very rare that they share database info. I'm only dealing with one
plant though it would be nice if are solution could be easily used by
others. It seems like a real pain to setup OID since you have to dig it
out of Application Server now. 
<snip>


**DISCLAIMER
This e-mail message and any files transmitted with it are intended for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed and may contain information that is privileged, proprietary and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender and delete this e-mail message. The contents do not represent the opinion of D&E except to the extent that it relates to their official business.

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l