Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: multiple patchsets

Re: multiple patchsets

From: Ray Stell <stellr_at_cns.vt.edu>
Date: 2006-01-06 04:04:26
Message-id: 20060106030426.GA13529@cns.vt.edu

so, if I patch 9204->9206->9207 can I skip the post-install procedures such as catproc and stuff and just do it at the end after the 9207 install?

On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 05:07:39PM -0500, Paul Drake wrote:
> On 1/5/06, Ray Stell wrote:
> >
> > Concerning Solaris 64bit 9.2.0.4.
> >
> > I found this note that says I have to apply 9.2.0.6 before 9.2.0.7. So,
> > I've never done this before, do you have to do post-install procedures
> > twice, catpatch.sql and the like? Ouch.
> >
> > Note:4711930.8
> > Subject: Bug 4711930 - Solaris 64bit: JRE 1.4.2 not installed by
> > 9.2.0.7 Patch Set install
> > Description
> >
> > When installing the 9.2.0.7 64-bit Patch Set on Solaris 64bit
> > JRE 1.4.2 is not installed if the current ORACLE_HOME is
> > at 9.2.0.4 (or lower).
> >
> > Workaround:
> > Install 9.2.0.5 or 9.2.0.6 before installing 9.2.0.7 or
> > If 9.2.0.7 has already been installed then install the
> > patch for bug 3870317 . This should install the JRE into
> > the ORACLE_HOME
> > --
> > http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
> >
> >
> >
> Ray,
>
> That sounds quite familiar.
> Originally, 9i R2 for lin_x86 was released as 9.2.0.3.
> It was later re-released as 9.2.0.4.
> The 9.2.0.5 patchset could not be applied to 9.2.0.3.
> At the time, there was no note about it - it was simply a difference of
> assumptions
> (the patchset was produced with the assumption that 9.2.0.4 had been
> applied).
>
> Paul

-- 
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Fri Jan 06 2006 - 04:04:26 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US