Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: v$sql 'db block changes'

RE: v$sql 'db block changes'

From: Allen, Brandon <Brandon.Allen_at_OneNeck.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 12:25:40 -0700
Message-ID: <04DDF147ED3A0D42B48A48A18D574C4503D3FF05@NT15.oneneck.corp>


Yes, and they actually added that to v$sql in 10g in a new column "direct_writes", but I don't see why they don't track "db block changes" as well - seems like it would be sensible and useful.

Thanks,
Brandon

-----Original Message-----

From: Christo Kutrovsky [mailto:kutrovsky.oracle_at_gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 12:21 PM To: Allen, Brandon
Cc: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: v$sql 'db block changes'

Direct path writes can be done by a shadow process (user session) so per sql you can have disk_writes. For example, create table as .. or insert /*+APPEND*/..

Christo Kutrovsky
Senior Database/System Administrator
The Pythian Group

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

--

http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l Received on Thu Dec 15 2005 - 13:25:56 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US