From oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Wed Dec 14 11:00:46 2005 Return-Path: Received: from air891.startdedicated.com (root@localhost) by orafaq.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jBEH0jtJ018325 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:00:45 -0600 X-ClientAddr: 206.53.239.180 Received: from turing.freelists.org (freelists-180.iquest.net [206.53.239.180]) by air891.startdedicated.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jBEH0iAX018313 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:00:44 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id E3C13255E14; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 12:00:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29185-02; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 12:00:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 5DE8D255B29; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 12:00:39 -0500 (EST) Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list oracle-l); Wed, 14 Dec 2005 12:00:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 1FEED255DFA for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 12:00:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29185-01 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 12:00:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpgate.vicr.com (smtpgate.vicr.com [207.141.187.5]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id CAF57255B29 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 12:00:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from 25exch1.vicorpower.vicr.com ([172.20.20.30]) by exchgate.vicorpower.vicr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Wed, 14 Dec 2005 12:00:24 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C600CF.DFF83EBA" Subject: RE: SQL Server 2005 Review Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 12:00:24 -0500 Message-ID: <4001DEAF7DF9BD498B58B45051FBEA6502FEE0B7@25exch1.vicorpower.vicr.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: SQL Server 2005 Review Thread-Index: AcYAy4tZaZY+8izARPKb8SFrnSHuAQABEJ0A From: "Goulet, Dick" To: , Cc: , "Oracle-L Freelists" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Dec 2005 17:00:24.0376 (UTC) FILETIME=[E00C2380:01C600CF] X-archive-position: 29166 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Errors-To: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: DGoulet@vicr.com Precedence: normal Reply-To: DGoulet@vicr.com X-list: oracle-l X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at avenirtech.net X-mailscan-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-mailscan-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact your Internet E-Mail Service Provider for details X-MailScanner-From: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org ------_=_NextPart_001_01C600CF.DFF83EBA Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Now I would not call that OT. In many cases it's dead on. _____ =20 From: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Ethan Post Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 11:27 AM To: ineyman@perceptron.com Cc: jkstill@gmail.com; Oracle-L Freelists Subject: Re: SQL Server 2005 Review A little off topic here but I found this illustration of the software development life cycle to be pretty amusing. http://openlexicon.org/xwiki/bin/view/lexicon/FAQ =20 On 12/14/05, Igor Neyman wrote:=20 Isn't it only natural, that complex systems are trying to get simpler, while simple systems are trying to get more complex, encroaching on each other territory?=20 Thanks Jared, good article. =20 Igor ------_=_NextPart_001_01C600CF.DFF83EBA Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Now I would not call that OT.  In many = cases it's dead=20 on.


From: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org=20 [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Ethan=20 Post
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 11:27 AM
To: = ineyman@perceptron.com
Cc: jkstill@gmail.com; Oracle-L=20 Freelists
Subject: Re: SQL Server 2005 = Review

A little off topic here but I found this illustration of the = software=20 development life cycle to be pretty amusing.

http://openlexicon.org/xwiki/bin/view/lexicon/FAQ=

On 12/14/05, Igor=20 Neyman <ineyman@perceptron.com>=20 wrote:=20
Isn't it=20 only natural, that complex systems are trying to get simpler, = while=20 simple systems are trying to get more complex, encroaching on each = other=20 territory?
Thanks=20 Jared, good=20 article.
 
Igor

------_=_NextPart_001_01C600CF.DFF83EBA-- -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l