Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: SQL Server 2005 Review

RE: SQL Server 2005 Review

From: Goulet, Dick <DGoulet_at_vicr.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 12:00:24 -0500
Message-ID: <4001DEAF7DF9BD498B58B45051FBEA6502FEE0B7@25exch1.vicorpower.vicr.com>


Now I would not call that OT. In many cases it's dead on.


From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Ethan Post Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 11:27 AM To: ineyman_at_perceptron.com
Cc: jkstill_at_gmail.com; Oracle-L Freelists Subject: Re: SQL Server 2005 Review

A little off topic here but I found this illustration of the software development life cycle to be pretty amusing.

http://openlexicon.org/xwiki/bin/view/lexicon/FAQ <http://openlexicon.org/xwiki/bin/view/lexicon/FAQ>

On 12/14/05, Igor Neyman <ineyman_at_perceptron.com> wrote:

        Isn't it only natural, that complex systems are trying to get simpler, while simple systems are trying to get more complex, encroaching on each other territory?

        Thanks Jared, good article.          

        Igor

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Wed Dec 14 2005 - 11:00:46 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US