From oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Mon Oct 24 09:59:05 2005 Return-Path: Received: from air891.startdedicated.com (root@localhost) by orafaq.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j9OEx1dp025033 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 09:59:01 -0500 X-ClientAddr: 206.53.239.180 Received: from turing.freelists.org (freelists-180.iquest.net [206.53.239.180]) by air891.startdedicated.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j9OEwtvX025000 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 09:58:56 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id BF1B320C5D0; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 09:58:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18322-09; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 09:58:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 11A0720CF92; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 09:58:27 -0500 (EST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=rV8F1yDB8yL29xSJ8R82RjNfWHt/o1rBjdkiMkePU+NrA82vS5Q06RozMffucRZyAgzzI56qj7Hw1XVUtNkC7/gQpdaNePsfAYd4ovVeO0xxUpnC/lQyIulzPT4eVtxwDFG6ZlvFxU9FrJlNSs/3HM04QN5L71bSVmPFMGFDNVk= Message-ID: Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 10:56:28 -0400 From: Richard Ji To: niall.litchfield@gmail.com Subject: Re: RTFM, Newbies etc Cc: oracle-l In-Reply-To: <7765c8970510231231h74d56904obfedc70967ce6bc3@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_32820_12946460.1130165788522" References: <7765c8970510231231h74d56904obfedc70967ce6bc3@mail.gmail.com> X-archive-position: 27438 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Errors-To: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: richard.c.ji@gmail.com Precedence: normal Reply-To: richard.c.ji@gmail.com X-list: oracle-l X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at avenirtech.net X-mailscan-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-mailscan-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on air891.startdedicated.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=ham version=2.63 ------=_Part_32820_12946460.1130165788522 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On 10/23/05, Niall Litchfield wrote: > > Splitting the list into two is I think also wrong, Lists are about sharin= g > information, not classifying people as experts or newbies. Don't wish to > respond to a waste of time then don't. Just please don't respond to them = in > order to tell them you're not talking to them. With all due respect. The suggestion on spliting list into two is not about classifying people, it's about classifying questions. You can still participate on both lists, nobody is stopping nobody from doing that. Just like we splited OT into a separate list a while back. But now that after reading a lot of people's responses, = I am fine with sticking with one list for now, unless it gets really bad. Thanks to gmail, which organize e-mail by threads, I can easily remove certain threads. ------=_Part_32820_12946460.1130165788522 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On 10/23/05, Nial= l Litchfield <niall.li= tchfield@gmail.com> wrote:

Splitting the list into two is I think also wrong, Lists are about sharing information, not classifying people as experts or newbies. Don't wish to respond to a waste of time then don't. Just please don't respond to them in order to tell = them you're not talking to them.


With all due respect.  The suggestion on spliting list into two is not about classifying people, it's about classifying questions.  You can still participate on both lists, nobody
is stopping nobody from doing that.  Just like we splited OT into a separate list a while back.  But now that after reading a lot of people's responses, I am fine with sticking with one list for now, unless it gets really bad.  Thanks to gmail, which organize e-mail by threads, I can easily remove certain threads.


------=_Part_32820_12946460.1130165788522-- -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l