From oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Mon Oct 3 09:23:37 2005 Return-Path: Received: from air891.startdedicated.com (root@localhost) by orafaq.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j93ENaaf017710 for ; Mon, 3 Oct 2005 09:23:36 -0500 X-ClientAddr: 206.53.239.180 Received: from turing.freelists.org (freelists-180.iquest.net [206.53.239.180]) by air891.startdedicated.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j93ENY6H017694 for ; Mon, 3 Oct 2005 09:23:35 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id CD0EE1F0BF4; Mon, 3 Oct 2005 09:23:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28736-06; Mon, 3 Oct 2005 09:23:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 563A01F0801; Mon, 3 Oct 2005 09:23:31 -0500 (EST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=JO/VGCEycXGEhkWB301nZcfB5veNeBPbDxQeO8goH2PquCsH11/21/nYY3iORbAn6Aj8LnqUZQchvcrRiELUc9piHzrPmDay2pxICUKo2gjGstHmXzsgDBOwr8ycs4smH+Nu3GpENSQuXrXQcTnncIcBDq1Hv/7DtU0wp299nww= Message-ID: Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 15:21:31 +0100 From: David Sharples To: cmarquez@collegeboard.org Subject: Re: Oracle RAC backup hardware/software recommendation? Cc: mueller_m@fiz-chemie.de, oracle-l@freelists.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_9137_7746852.1128349291582" References: X-archive-position: 26230 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Errors-To: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: davidsharples@gmail.com Precedence: normal Reply-To: davidsharples@gmail.com X-list: oracle-l X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at avenirtech.net X-mailscan-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-mailscan-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on air891.startdedicated.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=ham version=2.63 ------=_Part_9137_7746852.1128349291582 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Can you point me to the docs where it says dont put archivelogs on OCFS - The OCFS docs says it is quite suitable Thanks Dave On 10/3/05, Marquez, Chris wrote: > > We had a totally isolated disk for arch logs (on ocfs). Performance was > horrible...a huge bottle neck. > Trust me is was not the hardware (design). As soon as we went to EXT3 > file system the arch log bottle was gone. > > BTW, I have seem Oracle docs the recommend *NOT* putting arch logs on > ocfs. ------=_Part_9137_7746852.1128349291582 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
Can you point me to the docs where it says dont put archivelogs on OCF= S - The OCFS docs says it is quite suitable
 
Thanks
 
Dave

 
On 10/3/05, = Marquez, Chris <cmarque= z@collegeboard.org> wrote:
We had a totally isolated disk f= or arch logs (on ocfs).  Performance was
horrible...a huge bot= tle neck.
Trust me is was not the hardware (design).  As soon as we wen= t to EXT3
file system the arch log bottle was gone.

BTW, I have s= eem Oracle docs the recommend *NOT* putting arch logs on
ocfs.
------=_Part_9137_7746852.1128349291582-- -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l