Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: OT: win32: veritas embedded ms sql server huge memory hog

Re: OT: win32: veritas embedded ms sql server huge memory hog

From: Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 18:48:39 +0100
Message-ID: <7765c89705091310481e283d19@mail.gmail.com>


suggests to me that you have the full backup exec product (not just a remote and/or Oracle agent) installed on the box - hence the MSDE install. It can eat all your rpc connections as well :) .

Honestly paul - trying to do two things at once on a windows box <vbg>. Run a DB and backup software. If you are really lucky the tape drive will keep getting 'lost' and take the connections to the SAN with it.

Niall

On 9/13/05, Paul Drake <bdbafh_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> ms w2k3 server (32 bit)
> Oracle 10.1.0.4 <http://10.1.0.4> (32 bit)
> Veritas Backup Exec 9.1
>
> I've had it.
> This is the last time that I sit idly by and see Backup Exec allocate a
> process limit's worth of virtual memory to support a catalog database on a
> win32 oracle server. This box has no stand-alone ms sql server databases
> running on it.
>
> How do the folks at Veritas get away with this stuff?
> This is not the first time I've seen this type of behavior, but as its
> right in front of me currently ... its all too convenient to vent it here.
>
> Veritas - you hit my radar. I used to push Backup Exec as a third party
> backup software product.
> No more.
> Yes, I will RTFM and figure out how to cut this down the memory alloation
> to say 64 MB to handle the massive transaction load of 1 backup job per day
> on a server.
>
> (yes, I know that "pskill sqlservr" would do that quite nicely)
>
> In the meantime, if you're using Backup Exec on win32 - don't forget to
> add an extra 2 GB of physical memory for its embedded ms sql server process.
> Perhaps the vendor might refund you that cost from their product. ;P
>
> Its not my box - otherwise I'd talk to some other backup software vendor
> that offers trade-ins.
> It used to be that ARCServe and Veritas had a bigger war going than
> Netscape vs IE in the win32 space.
>
> C:\rant> pslist -m sql
>
> PsList 1.23 - Process Information Lister
> Copyright (C) 1999-2002 Mark Russinovich
> Sysinternals - www.sysinternals.com <http://www.sysinternals.com>
>
> Process memory detail for "a non MS SQL Server server":
>
> Name Pid VM WS WS Pk Priv Faults NonP Page PageFile
> sqlservr 1904 1746880 56452 56752 67480 65669 11 41 67480
> sqlmangr 1560 35448 4452 6204 1452 2078 3 36 1452
> sqlmangr 2204 35448 4452 6200 1452 2080 3 36 1452
>
> oracle 3076 555520 455192 486080 468116 12264247 13 90 468116
> oracle 2916 855088 734356 749404 755620 8561689 31 105 755620
>
> 1.67 GB of virtual memory allocated. I still can't believe it.
>
> back to BDBAFH mode.
>
> -bdbafh
>
>

-- 
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
http://www.niall.litchfield.dial.pipex.com

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Tue Sep 13 2005 - 12:50:46 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US