From oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Thu Sep 8 18:44:19 2005 Return-Path: Received: from air891.startdedicated.com (root@localhost) by orafaq.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j88NiJAM006339 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 18:44:19 -0500 X-ClientAddr: 206.53.239.180 Received: from turing.freelists.org (freelists-180.iquest.net [206.53.239.180]) by air891.startdedicated.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j88NiFIP006317 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 18:44:15 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id AFC811E982D; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 18:44:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11342-01; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 18:44:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 34B0C1B3537; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 18:44:08 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v734) In-Reply-To: References: <14F05E47-4C76-47BC-A9B8-BE74647C5A3E@furfly.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <54AB47FC-1E25-4191-AE34-C719B0E97A61@furfly.net> From: Janine Sisk Subject: Re: Any known problems with installing 8.1.7.4 on Solaris 9? Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 16:41:23 -0700 To: "oracle-l (E-mail)" X-archive-position: 25195 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Errors-To: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: janine@furfly.net Precedence: normal Reply-To: janine@furfly.net X-list: oracle-l X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at avenirtech.net X-mailscan-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-mailscan-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on air891.startdedicated.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 On Sep 8, 2005, at 2:27 PM, David Sharples wrote: > it was a supported configuration so should work fine > > usual caveat about 8i not in support anymore though Yes, I know, but it's ok. We'll get it upgraded at some point but for the moment it's working fine and very stable. Just needs to be moved to a new system. thanks, janine -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l