From oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Thu Sep 8 03:44:09 2005 Return-Path: Received: from air891.startdedicated.com (root@localhost) by orafaq.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j888i9fR008761 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 03:44:09 -0500 X-ClientAddr: 206.53.239.180 Received: from turing.freelists.org (freelists-180.iquest.net [206.53.239.180]) by air891.startdedicated.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j888i3IP008741 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 03:44:03 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id BF53E1E9DF4; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 03:43:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07676-02; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 03:43:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 38E5D1E9DB7; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 03:43:57 -0500 (EST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=CxnaHwNN35jCacaNrDdWaWJLqavFWE05DmnYMHDsGF8/PBA4dJHfo43t5g2JmchF+9HdYI17zipI+0ErJt4e7GlM2shj9iV935BD8u32qi6i9XBquDwzpnoMy4z7R6aHJRi2nhz2R/Qs/qZLFvPy1uvqJYFbekAOHh1nCpLXtj4= Message-ID: Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 15:41:47 +0800 From: Lou Fangxin To: David Sharples Subject: Re: An Old Topic: After I remove the online fuzzy tag of the datafile, can it be safe on standby? Cc: "Oracle-L (E-mail)" In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_11380_3506880.1126165307214" References: X-archive-position: 25149 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Errors-To: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: anysql@gmail.com Precedence: normal Reply-To: anysql@gmail.com X-list: oracle-l X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at avenirtech.net X-mailscan-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-mailscan-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on air891.startdedicated.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=ham version=2.63 ------=_Part_11380_3506880.1126165307214 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline We do not have backup software and we need to copy the datafile to another= =20 machine, and we cannot using NFS or vgexp/vgimp. That's why I think of this method, and I do not want to using rman to copy= =20 datafile to local file system first. Thanks. On 9/8/05, David Sharples wrote:=20 >=20 > why not just use rman - quicker, more reliable, SUPPORTED, works, doesnt= =20 > generate more redo > and does what it says on the tin. > And if you are generating too much redo, fix the problem so that you=20 > produce less or give yourself more disk space > That thread on cdos kinda says what people think about that 'tool' > On 9/8/05, Lou Fangxin wrote:=20 > >=20 > > Hi all: > > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.oracle.server/browse_th= read/thread/2ff023ab050b7525=20 > >=20 > > Why I pick it up is that I feel this utility is really useful in our= =20 > > environments, we have so many databases, we always need to build standb= y=20 > > from primary, and the archive log generate so fast that we have no enou= gh=20 > > space for archive log, so we must keep the standby recovery faster enou= gh.=20 > >=20 > > --=20 > > Welcome, http://www.anysql.net/en/=20 > >=20 >=20 >=20 --=20 Welcome, http://www.anysql.net/en/ ------=_Part_11380_3506880.1126165307214 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
We do not have backup software and we need to copy the datafile to ano= ther machine, and we cannot using NFS or vgexp/vgimp.
That's why I think of this method, and I do not want to using rman to = copy datafile to local file system first.
 
Thanks.

 
On 9/8/05, D= avid Sharples <davidsharp= les@gmail.com> wrote:
why not just use rman - quicker, more reliable, SUPPORTED, works, does= nt generate more redo
and does what it says on the tin.
 
And if you are generating too much redo, fix the problem so that you p= roduce less or give yourself more disk space
 
That thread on cdos kinda says what people think about that 'tool'
=  
On 9/8/05, L= ou Fangxin <anysql@gmail.com= > wrote: =20
Hi all:
 
 
    Why I pick it up is that I feel this utility is rea= lly useful in our environments, we have so many databases, we always need t= o build standby from primary, and the archive log generate so fast that we = have no enough space for archive log, so we must keep the standby recovery = faster enough.=20

--
Welcome, http://www.anysql.net/en/




--
Welcome, http://www.anysql.net/en/=20 ------=_Part_11380_3506880.1126165307214-- -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l