RE: Enqueue type - RO-Multiple Object Reuse (fast object reuse)

From: Khedr, Waleed <Waleed.Khedr_at_FMR.COM>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 17:39:43 -0400
Message-ID: <42BBD772AC30EA428B057864E203C999041FF2E6@MSGBOSCLF2WIN.DMN1.FMR.COM>

Do you use parallelism (PQO) while reading tables that might have been loaded/updated before/during the reads?

Waleed

-----Original Message-----
From: Keith Moore [mailto:kmoore_at_zephyrus.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 3:35 PM To: rshamsud_at_jcpenney.com
Cc: kmoore_at_zephyrus.com; oracle-l_at_freelists.org Subject: Re: Enqueue type - RO-Multiple Object Reuse (fast object reuse)

Thanks.

The database is version 10.1.0.3.

The strange thing is that no objects are being dropped. And certainly not
5180 times, like statspack shows.

Could this be a bug that 10.1.0.4 would fix? We have a strange situation here where the Sysadmin installs the softwarwe and then I take over. I've
been trying to get him to upgrade to 10.1.0.4, but without success.

It also makes it interesting when something doesn't work and you have to figure out what he might have done wrong.

Keith

> Keith
> RO enqueue is acquired while dropping/truncating the objects. Drop
> /truncate will post the DBWR to flush the buffers associated with
those
> objects. While DBWR is performing this operation, foreground process
> will wait for RO enqueue. Usually RO can be seen with CI (Cross
Instance
> invalidation ) enqueues even in non-rac single instances
>
> One of the primary reason is that DBWR is slow or buffer cache is
> too big.
>
> What is surprising though, this behavior is very visible up to 9i.
> But, in 10g, drop will simply rename the objects ( for flashback
> feature). Clearing the recycle bin will take care of flushing the
> buffers and so this is not a bigger issue anymore. Did you disable the
> flashback feature by any chance ?
>
> BTW, 10.0.3 looks too low of a version. So, far I have seen
10.1.0.4
> to be a stable release.
>
> Thanks
>
> Riyaj "Re-yas" Shamsudeen
> Certified Oracle DBA (ver 7.0 - 9i)
> Allocation & Assortment planning systems
> JCPenney
>
>
>
> Keith Moore wrote:
>
>>Does anyone have information on this?
>>
>>We have setup a two node 10g RAC database, Oracle version 10.0.3.
>>
>>I ran statspack for a test and this shows up as the top wait time in
one
>>instance with 3 minutes of wait time during a 12 minute test.
>>Interestingly, it has less than one second of wait on the other
instance.
>>
>>Here is the statspack info:
>>
>>Enqueue Type (Request Reason)
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------

>> Requests Succ Gets Failed Gets Waits Wt Time (s) Av Wt
>> Time(ms)
>>------------ ------------ ----------- ----------- ------------
>> --------------
>>RO-Multiple Object Reuse (fast object reuse)
>> 5,180 5,180 0 2,217 184
>> 83.00
>>TX-Transaction (row lock contention)
>> 23 23 0 23 1
>> 49.57
>>
>>Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>>
>>Keith
>>
>>
>>--
>>http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>>
>>
>
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity
to
> which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
> material. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient,
> you are hereby notified that your access is unauthorized, and any
review,
> dissemination, distribution or copying of this message including any
> attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
> computer.
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Wed Aug 31 2005 - 16:41:44 CDT