Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: re Index NOLOGGING -- was RE: ORA-1578...block

RE: re Index NOLOGGING -- was RE: ORA-1578...block

From: Hemant K Chitale <hkchital_at_singnet.com.sg>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 21:23:33 +0800
Message-Id: <6.2.1.2.0.20050825212245.01fce380@pop.singnet.com.sg>

Yes, that portion of the documentation, if read by itself, is incorrect. Hemant

At 11:55 PM Wednesday, Allen, Brandon wrote:
>Hemant, I'm not sure if you've been following the thread the whole time,
>but the issue we are currently addressing is the fact that the
>documentation clearly says that when an index is set to NOLOGGING
>(regardless of whether it was CREATEd or ALTERed NOLOGGING), that
>direct-path inserts will not be logged - see the logging_clause definition
>under the CREATE INDEX page at this link:
>http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/server.920/a96540/statements_510a.htm#SQLRF01209):
>
>
>Here is the relevant text:
>
>"logging_clause
>
>Specify whether the creation of the index will be logged (LOGGING) or not
>logged (NOLOGGING) in the redo log file. This setting also determines
>whether subsequent Direct Loader (SQL*Loader) and direct-path INSERT
>operations against the index are logged or not logged. LOGGING is the default."
>
>So, it appears that the documentation is incorrect - would you agree?
>

Hemant K Chitale
http://web.singnet.com.sg/~hkchital

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Thu Aug 25 2005 - 08:28:09 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US