Re: 9205 to 9206

Two positive notes:
1. It seemed to fix some CBO issues that we had been experiencing (we were on 9.2.0.5 with 9.2.0.6 core patch, and that version seemed far more prone to choosing ridiculous execution paths than when we were on "pure" 9.2.0.5 or 9.2.0.6).
2. It eliminated a RAC-specific ORA-600 bug in one of our more database-intensive batch processes.

Two bugs noted:
1. If you have a view that is SELECT ROWID, * from some_table, you can no longer INSERT into such a view on 9.2.0.6. 2. One of our other teams found a new bug with database links (I'm sorry I don't recall the details).

There was also a third bug that caused an instance shutdown when the host machine was heavily utilized. Apparently this was a known bug and fixed in 9.2.0.7. It has only happened to us once in 2 months but it is enough to make us paranoid about machine loads...

HTH
Tim

On 8/17/05, Loughmiller, Greg <greg.loughmiller_at_cingular.com> wrote:
>
>
> Seems to be stable.. Fixed a few of the 9205 perf issues as well as some
> streams issues.. And finally, you can avoid using any one off patches if you
> are in a RAC environment with 9206. So far, early testing on 9206/RAC shows
> all is well
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> From: raja rao [mailto:raja4list_at_yahoo.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 2:43 PM
> To: oracle list
> Subject: 9205 to 9206
>
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
>
>
> we are planning to migrate from 9205 to 9206 (oracle apps 11.5.10).
>
>
>
>
>
> is 9206 stable compare with 9205 ?
>
>
>
>
>
> anybody encountered any issues ?
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Raj
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l