From oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Wed Aug 3 11:52:59 2005 Return-Path: Received: from air891.startdedicated.com (root@localhost) by orafaq.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j73GqxEE010805 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2005 11:52:59 -0500 X-ClientAddr: 206.53.239.180 Received: from turing.freelists.org (freelists-180.iquest.net [206.53.239.180]) by air891.startdedicated.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j73GqpIP010767 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2005 11:52:51 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 3FFF81DC0CA; Wed, 3 Aug 2005 11:52:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02931-08; Wed, 3 Aug 2005 11:52:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id C2BA61DC0C8; Wed, 3 Aug 2005 11:52:45 -0500 (EST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=IPRNB4aUdWSwKc/5V3659cJE6OGGvMwLFaxWj8l5tNm7iMZIjJLwwNKMoMI4unG+asdftyafBoMNX6pbVz+o1ZtcWXccF1rn68uCvC1hE5kwBg+4RguRlBiPeAM3X2E3KXRR1JZlAm+iN4pcLQQroi6LERbqRHPpagF63TlUtVw= Message-ID: Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 09:50:50 -0700 From: Jared Still To: DGoulet@vicr.com Subject: Re: Why does Oracle ignore role-based privs in procedures? Cc: Rich.Jesse@quadtechworld.com, "oracle-l@freelists.org" In-Reply-To: <4001DEAF7DF9BD498B58B45051FBEA6502B2C47B@25exch1.vicorpower.vicr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_17_33140446.1123087850632" References: <4001DEAF7DF9BD498B58B45051FBEA6502B2C47B@25exch1.vicorpower.vicr.com> X-archive-position: 23251 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Errors-To: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: jkstill@gmail.com Precedence: normal Reply-To: jkstill@gmail.com X-list: oracle-l X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at avenirtech.net X-mailscan-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-mailscan-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on air891.startdedicated.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=ham version=2.63 ------=_Part_17_33140446.1123087850632 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On 8/3/05, Goulet, Dick wrote: >=20 > That changed in 10G I do believe. No, it is the same. http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14220/securit= y.htm#i14426 Roles were intended as a method to simplify the administration of user=20 privileges, and do not apply to the creation of stored procedures and views. The following MetaLink notes give some explanation: 11740.1 1011899.6 13615.1 --=20 Jared Still Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist ------=_Part_17_33140446.1123087850632 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On 8/3/05, Goulet, Dick <DGoulet@vicr.com> wrote:
http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/= server.102/b14220/security.htm#i14426

Roles were intended as a method to simplify the administration of user priv= ileges,
and do not apply to the creation of stored procedures and views.

The following MetaLink notes give some explanation:
11740.1
1011899.6
13615.1


--
Jared Still
Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl = Evangelist

------=_Part_17_33140446.1123087850632-- -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l