Re: 10.1.0.4 patchset 2 catcpu.sql slop

That's not the point, Oracle states in Metalink note 3663846.8 proclaiming that it is fixed in 10.1.0.4 <http://10.1.0.4> and is isn't. This works in 9ir2 but broke sometime in 10g. Can you spell regression?

Raj

On 6/29/05, Mladen Gogala <mgogala_at_allegientsystems.com> wrote:
>
> rjamya wrote:
>
> > One thing we found on 10.1.0.4 <http://10.1.0.4> <http://10.1.0.4> is
> large pl/sql
> > blocks don't compile. They fail with pls-123 Program too large error.
> > I am currently working on creating a test case for Support, since the
> > bug was closed as fixed in 10.1.0.4 <http://10.1.0.4> <http://10.1.0.4>.
> Ha !!
> >
> > Raj
> >
> One way of fixing this would be to make a recommendation not to use
> large PL/SQL blocks.
> That wouldn't be the first time that the problem is solved on the
> marketing level.
>
> --
> Mladen Gogala
> Oracle DBA
> Ext. 121
>
>
>

-- 
------------------------------
select standard_disclaimer from company_requirements where category = 
'MANDATORY';

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l