From oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Thu Jun 23 16:02:49 2005 Return-Path: Received: from air891.startdedicated.com (root@localhost) by orafaq.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j5NL2m4v011782 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 16:02:48 -0500 X-ClientAddr: 206.53.239.180 Received: from turing.freelists.org (freelists-180.iquest.net [206.53.239.180] (may be forged)) by air891.startdedicated.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j5NL2jNi011776 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 16:02:46 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 8E6811C3388; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 14:58:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14247-10; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 14:58:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 0CE8D1C336F; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 14:58:37 -0500 (EST) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C5782D.B00DF00F" Subject: ASM (was RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 12:56:47 -0700 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: ASM (was RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)) Thread-Index: AcV3anWMdMW/PNG/T8api3imqcpZugAw2ytA From: "Kevin Closson" To: X-archive-position: 21627 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Errors-To: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: kevinc@polyserve.com Precedence: normal Reply-To: kevinc@polyserve.com X-list: oracle-l X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at avenirtech.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on air891.startdedicated.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C5782D.B00DF00F Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =20 =20 Metalink Note:277274.1. Period. =20 =20 ________________________________ From: John Smiley [mailto:jrsmiley@gmail.com]=20 Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 1:39 PM To: kevinc@polyserve.com Cc: oracle-l@freelists.org Subject: Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...) =09 =09 While we're on the topic of ASM, how many are using it in production today? After hearing the horror stories about how bugs in ASM caused it to basically lose its mind and forget where everything was left me wondering if I'll ever trust this product with my data. Some poor souls followed Oracle's advice and stored their backups in ASM along with their database and lost everything.=20 =20 John Smiley Technical Management Consultant TUSC, Inc. =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C5782D.B00DF00F Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Metalink Note:277274.1. Period.

From: John Smiley = [mailto:jrsmiley@gmail.com]=20
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 1:39 PM
To:=20 kevinc@polyserve.com
Cc: = oracle-l@freelists.org
Subject:=20 Re: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality = of...)

While we're on the topic of ASM, how many are using it in = production=20 today? After hearing the horror stories about how bugs in ASM = caused it=20 to basically lose its mind and forget where everything was left me = wondering=20 if I'll ever trust this product with my data. Some poor souls = followed=20 Oracle's advice and stored their backups in ASM along with their = database and=20 lost everything.

John Smiley

Technical Management Consultant

TUSC, Inc.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C5782D.B00DF00F-- -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l