Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Q: Filesystem choice for log_archive_dest

Re: Q: Filesystem choice for log_archive_dest

From: Radoulov, Dimitre <cichomitiko_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 19:46:54 +0200
Message-ID: <007b01c5781b$8cc92610$2d08310a@IBME1D11967173>


I will try to investigate further with 10046(for wait events) and truss(for system calls) to come out with a valid test result.

Cheers
Dimitre

> It's a very busy critical production system. When we saw the "cannot
> allocate new log" messages, we increased the redo logs from 8x256Mb to
> 16x256Mb and the messages disappeared. But our analysis was: the only
> thing changed was the direct IO activation, we've never had this problems
> before, the load appeared to be the same(it's hard to measure, it's a
> mobile phone company with all those SMS services). So now I'm trying to
> find the technical explanation of why one could need a direct IO
> filesystem for the archived log files.
> And there is another thing, that made me post the question: yesterday we
> had to run a report query from sqlplus and guess what: the first person
> ran the report spooling under the OFA's filesystem, the result was
> ORA-01555 after 3h! And the second, me, ran the same query(same execution
> plan!) spooling on the host's local filesystem - successfully in 15min ...
> So, we ran another test today with another query, the results: spooling on
> the direct IO filesystem: 30min, on the local filesystem: 49s.
>
>
>
> Thanks
> Dimitre
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kevin Closson" <kevinc_at_polyserve.com>
> To: <oracle-l_at_freelists.org>
> Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 6:21 PM
> Subject: RE: Q: Filesystem choice for log_archive_dest
>
>
>>
>> >So I was wondering, could the direct IO be beneficial for the
>> log_archive_dest filesystem in some cases?
>>
>> yep...see my last post. This just needs tuning. how many
>> online logs do you have and what size are they?
>>
>> --
>> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Thu Jun 23 2005 - 13:59:23 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US