As long as your archiver processes are able to keep up with the log file
switches, it doesn't matter what type of filesystem they're on. If you start
seeing the archiver lag behind, or worse, you system comes to a screeching
halt because it can't perform a log switch, you can increase the number of
archive log processes (if the disks supporting the log archive dest(s) can
handle more load) or store the archive logs on faster I/O. Typically this
takes the form of LUNs on a RAID 1+0 using your file system of choice. For
best performance, give the archivelogs their own set of disks.
John Smiley
Technical Management Consultant
TUSC, Inc.
On 6/23/05, Radoulov, Dimitre <cichomitiko_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> could anyone provide guidelines for the log archive destination
> filesystem's/IO type choice (both MS and *nix solutions would be
> interesting)?
> Thanks,
> Dimitre
>
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Thu Jun 23 2005 - 11:41:56 CDT
