From oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Tue Jun 21 14:09:57 2005 Return-Path: Received: from air891.startdedicated.com (root@localhost) by orafaq.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j5LJ9v1x028905 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:09:57 -0500 X-ClientAddr: 206.53.239.180 Received: from turing.freelists.org (freelists-180.iquest.net [206.53.239.180]) by air891.startdedicated.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j5LJ9vNi028901 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:09:57 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id EBA511C2FF8; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:06:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21210-08; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:06:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 7250A1C2D52; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:06:32 -0500 (EST) From: ryan_gaffuri@comcast.net To: cmarquez@collegeboard.org, , Cc: "Marquez, Chris" Subject: RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 18:04:09 +0000 Message-Id: <062120051804.13446.42B85698000EFF31000034862205886360079D9A00000E09A1020E979D@comcast.net> X-Authenticated-Sender: cnlhbl9nYWZmdXJpQGNvbWNhc3QubmV0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_13446_1119377049_0" X-archive-position: 21437 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Errors-To: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: ryan_gaffuri@comcast.net Precedence: normal Reply-To: ryan_gaffuri@comcast.net X-list: oracle-l X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at avenirtech.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on air891.startdedicated.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE, MIME_BOUND_NEXTPART,MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 --NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_13446_1119377049_0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit I believe I read that CERN is planning on creating a DB that may reach 20 petabytes(not sure what the time table is for this) and they plan to use Oracle's 'grid'. I would assume this would be more than 48 Nodes. anyone know any details about the CERN project? -------------- Original message -------------- Kevin, Well said. Chris Marquez Oracle DBA -----Original Message----- From: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org on behalf of Kevin Closson Sent: Tue 6/21/2005 12:22 PM To: oracle-l@freelists.org Subject: RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...) > The biggest production RAC environment that I know of (in terms of nodes in the > cluster) is 48 - currently supported by some of the most talented DBAs on the --NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_13446_1119377049_0 Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

I believe I read that CERN is planning on creating a DB that may reach 20 petabytes(not sure what the time table is for this) and they plan to use Oracle's 'grid'. I would assume this would be more than 48 Nodes.

anyone know any details about the CERN project?

-------------- Original message --------------

Kevin,

Well said.

Chris Marquez
Oracle DBA

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org on behalf of Kevin Closson
Sent: Tue 6/21/2005 12:22 PM
To: oracle-l@freelists.org
Subject: RE: 64 node Oracle RAC Cluster (The reality of...)

> The biggest production RAC environment that I know of (in terms of
nodes in the > cluster) is 48 - currently supported by some of the most
talented DBAs on the

--NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_13446_1119377049_0-- -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l