From oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Sun Jun 5 08:59:36 2005 Return-Path: Received: from air891.startdedicated.com (root@localhost) by orafaq.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j55Dxae3024945 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 08:59:36 -0500 X-ClientAddr: 206.53.239.180 Received: from turing.freelists.org (freelists-180.iquest.net [206.53.239.180]) by air891.startdedicated.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j55DxaNi024941 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 08:59:36 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 448831BB024; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 07:56:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30718-09; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 07:56:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id BDC421B90A7; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 07:56:27 -0500 (EST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=usGBCReEFOpKor8T2MPwMdthj5vVaYC/L9iTZUBIQjBOh20wLJhTeBNSG904/yZawtUXCDqYjer0ShENG/ps/X34bNQNSLxhE0sT/GYADXk6hBxWNhQ1BlFNJLjgsnther+hFu8BPRzbIUTkILHIq0+evHi3cbyccwGezlNhWPk= Message-ID: <9177895d05060505543d13aa9e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2005 08:54:38 -0400 From: rjamya To: thump@cosmiccooler.org Subject: Re: Oracle RAC cost justification? Cc: mgogala@allegientsystems.com, tim@evdbt.com, Oracle Discussion List In-Reply-To: <40376.127.0.0.1.1117737106.squirrel@www.cosmiccooler.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain References: <429F4922.6060208@allegientsystems.com> <40376.127.0.0.1.1117737106.squirrel@www.cosmiccooler.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 20670 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Errors-To: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: rjamya@gmail.com Precedence: normal Reply-To: rjamya@gmail.com X-list: oracle-l X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at avenirtech.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on air891.startdedicated.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=ham version=2.63 We do and I can tell you, if implemeted correctly, it works fine. Hundreds of our users who rely on split-second response times do not even know if their application gets moved from one node to another. Might be because for such critical sessions we do pre-connects. but yes, it works. For applications it is usually few seconds when they get errors and have to connect again. Raj On 6/2/05, David wrote: > > Who is using TAF here? > Does it work seamlessy or transparantly? No issues? > If you lose a node/instance, what happens next? Is there any impact on > the others heads in terms of smon/eviction? How long does it take to get > the application to start hitting an instance an another node? > > ------------------------------ select standard_disclaimer from company_requirements where category = 'MANDATORY'; -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l