Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Oracle RAC cost justification?

RE: Oracle RAC cost justification?

From: Khemmanivanh, Somckit <somckit.khemmanivanh_at_weyerhaeuser.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 16:30:05 -0700
Message-ID: <65C0D8935651CB4D96E97CEFAC5A12B9444598@wafedixm10.corp.weyer.pri>

Thanks, Tom M. had sent those to me privately also. Those papers were exactly what I was looking for... I was trying to go beyond the hype of RAC and see how people justify the costs of RAC -- apparently there're opinions on both sides on this topic...

Thanks for sharing...=20

Thanks!=20
-----Original Message-----
From: delysid_at_amber.monochrome.net [mailto:delysid_at_amber.monochrome.net] On Behalf Of David
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 4:27 PM
To: Khemmanivanh, Somckit
Cc: Jared Still; Vlado Barun; oracle-l_at_freelists.org Subject: RE: Oracle RAC cost justification?

RAC and a cost effective solution is an oxymoron. Add another node...

If you have'nt seen these papers, they sum it up nicely and accuratly in my opinion:
http://www.miracleas.dk/WritingsFromMogens/YouProbablyDontNeedRACUSVersi on.pdf

http://www.miracleas.dk/images/upload/Docs/MS%20OracleRAC%20whitepaper.p df

--=20
..
David

> Well RAC is not the SAN right? RAC is HA for the Oracle Instance.
>
> If you're saying the total HA solution involves eliminating all SPOFs,
> I'd agree but cost is always a limiting factor in that regard...
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Jared Still [mailto:jkstill_at_gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 4:04 PM
> To: Khemmanivanh, Somckit
> Cc: Vlado Barun; oracle-l_at_freelists.org
> Subject: Re: Oracle RAC cost justification?
>
>
>
> On 6/1/05, Khemmanivanh, Somckit

<somckit.khemmanivanh_at_weyerhaeuser.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> Let's say we already have Service Guard in house. For new
> implementations should we go with MCSG or look at RAC? RAC is an
> HA and
> scalability solution (MCSG is purely HA). I'm trying to get a
> good
>
>
>
> RAC might be many things, but HA is not one of them.
>
> The disk subsystem is a single point of failure: you only have one
> database.
>
> --
> Jared Still
> Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Wed Jun 01 2005 - 19:35:02 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US