From oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Thu May 26 11:05:13 2005 Return-Path: Received: from air891.startdedicated.com (root@localhost) by orafaq.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j4QG5DQg021210 for ; Thu, 26 May 2005 11:05:13 -0500 X-ClientAddr: 206.53.239.180 Received: from turing.freelists.org (freelists-180.iquest.net [206.53.239.180]) by air891.startdedicated.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j4QG5DNi021206 for ; Thu, 26 May 2005 11:05:13 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id AF1041B334E; Thu, 26 May 2005 10:02:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04997-06; Thu, 26 May 2005 10:02:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 36CBB1B3006; Thu, 26 May 2005 10:02:14 -0500 (EST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=kL+QKa4759ZI67QxlWWqK6hFpvSl6YykNS/cOen6NcjyjD96lG9rpm4X2wYTdln0MMvTEHvZlyml04bg9WXKvx0j6ITNKtli69vGrISDtuwLqu4FN8ntht/GHux7XFavQglG+OVLk+bEl2deil656GPk67UiTZaIIXVFTatfktM= Message-ID: <7765c89705052608007b09c9a5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 16:00:26 +0100 From: Niall Litchfield To: vlado@cadre5.com Subject: Re: To Sql Server??? Cc: Michael.Kline@suntrust.com, oracle-l@freelists.org In-Reply-To: <200505261420.j4QEKE639683@cadre5.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain References: <52C70FF150F49E479DAF59C68A27149D010A6A8D@va016a0e2.corp.suntrust.com> <200505261420.j4QEKE639683@cadre5.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 20340 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Errors-To: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: niall.litchfield@gmail.com Precedence: normal Reply-To: niall.litchfield@gmail.com X-list: oracle-l X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at avenirtech.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on air891.startdedicated.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=ham version=2.63 the concurrency model is a big difference and one that applies in spades, in terms of feature difference though I doubt that there is anything much that you can do on a 7.3.4 database that you can't easily achieve on SQL2000. I'd also be sceptical of the comment about the different code lengths for pl/sql and t-sql -- Niall Litchfield Oracle DBA http://www.niall.litchfield.dial.pipex.com -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l