From oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Fri Mar 25 19:21:03 2005 Return-Path: Received: from air891.startdedicated.com (root@localhost) by orafaq.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j2Q1Kgen001320 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 19:20:52 -0600 X-ClientAddr: 206.53.239.180 Received: from turing.freelists.org (freelists-180.iquest.net [206.53.239.180]) by air891.startdedicated.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j2Q1Kfem001315 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 19:20:41 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 1D68C89D4C; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 19:18:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26600-02; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 19:18:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 93B5589DB0; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 19:18:50 -0500 (EST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=KliPxqTPeqP9B+htvh1xityYAlzbGCIaDMclg1sJxk3yp4k4UcDFqKFWbmSMIuSDZns0MmY1LegmXzlvnRUszdccEEhSEp2ecpawHnGn0Llpc0mNKOEDWx5q4cwTDc002ALb9iXhizNaBCAO1TNP4VNhosDH6tolmc0BhJ0SGEQ= Message-ID: Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 19:17:03 -0500 From: mhthomas To: thomas.mercadante@labor.state.ny.us Subject: Re: how goes 10.1.0.4 testing? Cc: "bdbafh@gmail.com" , Oracle Discussion List In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit References: X-archive-position: 17712 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Errors-To: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: qnxodba@gmail.com Precedence: normal Reply-To: qnxodba@gmail.com X-list: oracle-l X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at avenirtech.net X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on air891.startdedicated.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=ham version=2.60 X-Spam-Level: Hi, On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 15:24:24 -0500, Mercadante, Thomas F wrote: > I'm waiting for 10.2. There is no way I would recommend 10.1 to my current > employer. > > We just applied the "January 2005" 1st quarter patch to one of our 9.2.0.4 > databases. The patch process has a bug. It doesn't update the inventory > xml file properly. The work-around is to go in and update the file by hand. A couple days ago I noticed a security rollup patch. It was after "Jan 2005" patch, but it might have been 10g only. I'm curious if it might be related to the same thing? Its too late on Friday to go looking, so it will wait till Monday. :-) Regards, Mike Thomas -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l