From oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Wed Jan 26 15:40:37 2005 Return-Path: Received: from air891.startdedicated.com (root@localhost) by orafaq.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j0QLebiI010094 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 15:40:37 -0600 X-ClientAddr: 206.53.239.180 Received: from turing.freelists.org (freelists-180.iquest.net [206.53.239.180]) by air891.startdedicated.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j0QLeaem010090 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 15:40:36 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 4EBED65915; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 15:39:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09945-06; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 15:39:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id C331864BE6; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 15:39:48 -0500 (EST) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: RE: 9iRAC or 10GRAC? Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 15:37:02 -0500 Message-ID: <7E412C164E6ECB468834A39F31E6E0D40666DBB6@mbs06dc.na.aarp.int> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: 9iRAC or 10GRAC? Thread-Index: AcUDxQsp5NrSTNYPR0aw0liKNfCLiwAIUT6Q From: "Marquez, Chris" To: , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jan 2005 20:38:07.0077 (UTC) FILETIME=[F102A150:01C503E6] X-archive-position: 15286 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Errors-To: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: CMarquez@aarp.org Precedence: normal Reply-To: CMarquez@aarp.org X-list: oracle-l X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at example.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on air891.startdedicated.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=ham version=2.60 X-Spam-Level: >>What advantages do 10G RAC has over 9iRAC? More people have implemented 9iRAC...to me this equals better support and more information. Also a real question is, ISV's software support for 10g, drivers, backups software , monitoring software, etc. But I'm sure there are benefits too? Chris Marquez Oracle DBA HEYMONitor(tm) - heymonitor.com "Oracle Monitoring & Alerting Solution" -----Original Message----- From: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of susan lam Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 11:36 AM To: oracle-l@freelists.org Subject: 9iRAC or 10GRAC? We have been planning on implementing 9i RAC solution for the last few months. Since 10G R2 will probably be available within the next 6months, I think we should put our implementation on hold until R2 is released.=20 What advantages do 10G RAC has over 9iRAC? For one, I think with the EM Grid Control, it's easier to manage the environment. If you have a document to point me to, I would appreciate that too. Thanks. susan =09 __________________________________=20 Do you Yahoo!?=20 Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250 -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l