Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: About standby redo logs

RE: About standby redo logs

From: Loughmiller, Greg <greg.loughmiller_at_cingular.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:52:14 -0600
Message-ID: <5164A49467308C45AD50661F8CFDC3431E11BF70@s30342g004004.wdc.cingular.net>


If I may ask a similar question, yet not exactly related to this thread.. What are the advantages of using LGWR as compared to the ARCH process for the transport mechanism of the redo data to the standby database?

Thanks
Greg
-----Original Message-----
From: Carel-Jan Engel [mailto:cjpengel.dbalert_at_xs4all.nl] Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 11:55 AM To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: About standby redo logs

Kamus,
Oracle documents that one needs at least the # of redo log groups on the primary + 1 on the standby, when standby redologs are used. I never saw a logswitch happen to another standby redologfile than the one previously used, so your observation is quite normal, though somewhat unexpected regarding the documented requirements. DG always seems to reuse the same logfile. I guess it has to do with the speed of the ARCH on the standby. I need to investigate this further if I get a chance on a testsystem, before I can get more conclusive on this.

Because normally DG-configurations have real HA requirements (if not, why was DG implemented), I tend to stay on the safe side and follow the Oracle docs. It's a little bit CYA, I admit, so be it.

Best regards,

Carel-Jan Engel

===
If you think education is expensive, try ignorance. (Derek Bok) ===

Upcoming appearances:

On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 15:33, Kamus wrote:

> I create 4 standby redo log groups, and use LGWR in primary site to
> transfer redo data, all are good.
> But when I query the V$STANDBY_LOG view,
> I found that only the status column of GROUP# 4(the first group of my
> standby redo logs) value is "ACTIVE" while all the others(5-7) are
> "UNASSIGNED".
> also, only GROUP# 4's sequence# is a value greate than 0
> and THREAD# is 1, all others are 0 and 0.
>
> Any explains.

            
      * 


--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Wed Jan 05 2005 - 12:50:20 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US