Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Storage array advice anyone?

Re: Storage array advice anyone?

From: Matthew Zito <mzito_at_gridapp.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 11:53:54 -0500
Message-Id: <3CA3CA8A-504C-11D9-8ED0-000393D3B578@gridapp.com>

There's a difference, though - the mainframe was massive hardware with massive redundancy implemented in hardware, resulting in a massive cost, but very low maintenance

Larry's vision is one big database, one big application instance, running on hundreds of small commodity servers with redundancy implemented in software, resulting in a very low cost but very high maintenance.

Into the gap steps companies like mine (and our competitors) that try to bridge the gap - aid in the management of large numbers of commodity servers.

Thanks,
Matt

--
Matthew Zito
GridApp Systems
Email: mzito_at_gridapp.com
Cell: 646-220-3551
Phone: 212-358-8211 x 359
http://www.gridapp.com


On Dec 17, 2004, at 9:58 AM, Hostetter, Jay M wrote:


> We used to call this centralized setup a "mainframe."=20
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
> [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Martic Zoran
> Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 9:44 AM
> To: Oracle-L
> Subject: Re: Storage array advice anyone?
>
> Is that not similar to what Oracle (Larry E) wants on the database
> level, to centralize everything into one piece and just average
> everything across that one piece hoping that with some resource
> manager/smart logic you can force some inequality?
>
> Is that not as what UNIX/Linux/NT is doing with CPU's?
>
> It only looks that the storage piece is still not that mature in
> global.
> Or I missed something?
>
> Regards,
> Zoran Martic
>
> --- Matthew Zito <mzito_at_gridapp.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> **DISCLAIMER
> This e-mail message and any files transmitted with it are intended for
> the =
> use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed and may
> contain=
> information that is privileged, proprietary and confidential. If you
> are n=
> ot the intended recipient, you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone
> the =
> message or any information contained in the message. If you have
> received t=
> his communication in error, please notify the sender and delete this
> e-mail=
> message. The contents do not represent the opinion of D&E except to
> the ex=
> tent that it relates to their official business.
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Fri Dec 17 2004 - 10:50:06 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US